Countries With the Highest Debt to GDP Ratio in 2026
ภาษาไทย Español Português 한국어 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt Bahasa Indonesia Монгол ئۇيغۇر تىلى العربية Русский हिन्दी

Countries With the Highest Debt to GDP Ratio in 2026

Author: Charon N.

Published on: 2026-06-26

One government owes more than twice everything its economy produces in a year. Another sits near the very top of the same list yet holds one of the safest credit ratings on earth.


The world’s debt map in 2026 is full of contradictions like these, and the only fair way to read it is the measure economists actually use: debt-to-GDP, a government’s debt weighed against the size of the economy behind it. Raw dollar totals tell little on their own, because a large economy can shoulder far more than a small one.

Which Countries Have Highest Debt To GDP Ratio in 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Japan has the world’s highest debt-to-GDP ratio in 2026 at 204.4%, but it is mostly yen-denominated and domestically held, which keeps the burden manageable [1].

  • The ranking uses general government gross debt as a share of GDP. Because gross debt ignores the assets a government holds, it can overstate fiscal risk, most clearly for Singapore [1].

  • Singapore ranks second at 171.9%, yet its financial assets exceed its liabilities, leaving it with no net debt in the government’s own presentation [3].

  • The United States (about 126%) and China (about 107%) are not at the top, but matter most for global markets, with both projected to rise toward roughly 142% and 127% by 2031 [1].

  • Global public debt reached about 94% of GDP in 2025 and is set to approach 100% by 2029, so high ratios are increasingly common rather than exceptional [2].

  • A high debt-to-GDP ratio signals burden, not inevitable default; sustainability depends on currency, ownership, interest costs, maturities, growth, and credibility.


Top 30 Countries With the Highest Debt-to-GDP Ratios in 2026

Heavy debt ratios are becoming more common: the IMF puts global public debt at about 94% of world GDP in 2025 and projects it to approach 100% by 2029 [2]. Across the wider IMF dataset, more than 20 economies exceed 100% of GDP.


The figures use IMF April 2026 World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor projections for general government gross debt as a percentage of GDP, the broadest comparable cross-country measure [1]. Countries without a clean, comparable 2026 value, including Venezuela, Lebanon, and Sri Lanka (whose latest IMF reading is a 2024 figure), are excluded.


Rank Country 2026 (% of GDP) Quick read
1 Japan 204.4 Domestic, yen-funded
2 Singapore 171.9 High gross debt, no net debt
3 Sudan 169.1 High-uncertainty estimate
4 Bahrain 152.4 Oil-revenue dependent
5 Italy 138.4 Deep euro bond market
6 Greece 136.9 Down from 200%+ peak
7 Senegal 132.3 Upward debt revision
8 Maldives 129.4 Small, tourism-reliant
9 United States 125.8 Reserve currency; rising path
10 Ukraine 122.6 War financing; restructuring
11 Bhutan 120.3 Hydropower loans; concessional
12 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 120.1 Disaster-exposed island
13 France 118.4 Deep euro-area market
14 Canada 110.7 Gross high; net much lower
15 Belgium 109.2 Long-standing high euro debt
16 China 106.9 Mostly domestic; local-government stress
17 Mozambique 106.1 Concessional-finance reliant
18 United Kingdom 103.6 Own-currency gilt market
19 Bolivia 102.7 Tighter external financing
20 Dominica 98.3 Small, disaster-prone island
21 Spain 98.2 Improving euro economy
22 Brazil 96.5 Local-currency; high real rates
23 Cabo Verde 95.9 Small, tourism-led
24 Finland 93.1 Rising but credible
25 Congo, Rep. 91.3 Oil, restructuring history
26 Barbados 89.5 Restructured; IMF-supported
27 Suriname 87.1 Restructured; oil prospects
28 Egypt, Arab Rep. 87.0 IMF-backed reforms
29 Mauritius 86.5 Small, diversified services
30 Gabon 86.1 Oil-dependent economy

Source: IMF April 2026 World Economic Outlook / Fiscal Monitor, general government gross debt (% of GDP), 2026 projection [1]; cross-checked against the IMF DataMapper. Venezuela, Lebanon, and Sri Lanka are excluded because their available IMF values are not clean 2026 projections.


Why Japan Has the World’s Highest Debt-to-GDP Ratio

Japan has the world’s highest debt-to-GDP ratio in 2026, and by a wide margin. IMF projections put general government gross debt at 204.4% of GDP, meaning the government owes roughly twice the value of annual economic output [1]. Yet the country has avoided a funding crisis because the debt is mostly yen-denominated, domestically held, and supported by deep local savings.


Ownership is the key difference. Japan had about ¥1,026 trillion of government bonds outstanding at the end of 2025, and the holder base is overwhelmingly domestic [5]:


  • The Bank of Japan held roughly 49%, the legacy of years of large-scale bond purchases.

  • Domestic banks and insurers held about 31% between them. 

  • Foreign investors owned less than 7%, which sharply reduces exposure to sudden capital flight or foreign-currency refinancing stress.


The risk is real, but it is gradual rather than sudden. Japan faces weak growth, rapid ageing, and rising refinancing costs as ultra-low interest rates fade. The debt ratio shows the weight of the burden; the currency, the investor base, and the central-bank role explain why that burden has stayed manageable.


Why Singapore’s High Debt-to-GDP Ratio Is Misleading

Singapore’s 171.9% debt-to-GDP ratio is the clearest warning against reading gross debt as a solvency score [1]. It ranks near the top of the global table, yet the government has no net debt, because its financial assets exceed its liabilities [3]. The gross number counts borrowings but ignores the public assets built on the other side of the balance sheet.


The reason is because Singapore does not borrow to fund day-to-day fiscal deficits. Its government securities are issued for purposes unrelated to deficit financing:


  • developing and deepening the domestic bond market;

  • providing safe, long-term assets for the Central Provident Fund (CPF) pension system; and

  • funding nationally significant infrastructure.


The proceeds are invested rather than consumed, which makes the gross ratio look far heavier than the state’s true fiscal position. The sharper question for Singapore is not whether gross debt looks high, but whether assets exceed liabilities and investment income supports the budget. 


On that test the picture changes completely: the gross ratio measures balance-sheet size, while net debt measures fiscal strain, and Singapore’s risk sits firmly in the first category, not the second [3].


US and China Debt-to-GDP: Why the Biggest Risks Are Not at the Top

The United States and China are not the two highest-ranked countries, but they are the two that matter most for global markets. The US sits near 125.8% of GDP in 2026, while China stands around 106.9% [1]. 


IMF projections run to 2031, and both paths point higher, with the US heading toward about 142% and China toward roughly 127% [1], which matters because US Treasuries anchor global borrowing costs while China’s fiscal expansion shapes commodities, banks, trade, and emerging-market risk.


The US still enjoys the strongest funding privilege in the world. It borrows in the currency used for reserves, trade settlement, and global collateral, through the deepest sovereign bond market on earth. The risk is not market access today; it is the slow repricing of a rising debt path, because higher Treasury yields reset the cost of capital far beyond America.


China’s risk is different. Its debt is mostly domestic, which limits sudden foreign-currency pressure but concentrates stress inside local governments, banks, property-linked balance sheets, and state financing vehicles. The question is less external default risk than whether public credit can keep supporting growth without weakening the financial system.


Neither country leads the table, but both shape the cycle behind it.


Why Small Economies Can Look Riskier Than They Are

Small economies often look more fragile in a debt-to-GDP table because the denominator is narrow. The Maldives, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Dominica, and Cabo Verde rely heavily on tourism, imports, and external finance, so a weak travel season, a hurricane, or a jump in global interest rates can move the debt ratio sharply when GDP is small and volatile.


That is not the same as saying every small, high-debt economy is near default. Concessional loans, long maturities, multilateral support, and disaster financing can make a high ratio more manageable than it first appears. The headline number needs context: export base, foreign reserves, debt currency, refinancing schedule, and exposure to climate shocks.


Some entries are not ordinary market borrowers at all. Sudan’s figure carries unusually high uncertainty. Ukraine reflects war financing and restructuring pressure. Senegal’s near-132% ratio follows a major upward public-debt revision linked to hidden debt and continuing IMF discussions [4].


Barbados, Suriname, and the Republic of Congo sit in another category: post-restructuring borrowers rebuilding credibility. Their debt ratios still look high, but the direction of reform, the primary balance, and IMF engagement matter as much as the number itself. In this part of the table, debt-to-GDP is a warning light, not a full diagnosis.


FAQs

Which country has the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in 2026?

Japan, at roughly 204% of GDP in the IMF’s April 2026 projection, the highest in the world by this measure [1].


Is the US the most indebted country?

Not by this ratio. The United States is around 126% of GDP, which places it in the middle of the top ten rather than at the top. It draws attention because of its size, its role as reserve-currency issuer, and a debt path the IMF expects to keep rising, toward roughly 142% by 2031 [1].


Why is Singapore’s debt-to-GDP so high?

Because the figure is gross debt, which ignores assets. Singapore borrows mainly for investment, holds assets well in excess of its debt, and has effectively no net debt [3]; it is also rated AAA by the major agencies [6]. Its high gross ratio reflects strategy, not distress.


Does high debt-to-GDP mean a country will default?

No. The ratio measures burden, not inevitability. Whether a high level is sustainable depends on the currency the debt is in, whether it is held domestically or abroad, interest costs, the maturity structure, economic growth, fiscal credibility, and the central-bank environment. Japan has stayed above 100% for decades without default, while some countries have run into difficulty at far lower ratios.


What High Debt-to-GDP Really Tells Investors

A debt-to-GDP ranking shows where government debt sits heaviest relative to economic output. It does not predict default by itself.


Sustainability depends on the debt currency, creditor base, refinancing cost, maturity profile, growth rate, and fiscal credibility. Japan, Singapore, and the US show why the same headline ratio can carry very different risks.


Debt-to-GDP is a starting point for sovereign-risk analysis, not a final judgement on solvency.


Sources

  1. IMF, World Economic Outlook (April 2026) and Fiscal Monitor (April 2026), general government gross debt, percent of GDP (GGXWDG_NGDP)

  2. IMF, Fiscal Monitor (April 2026), on global public debt near 94% of GDP in 2025 and reaching 100% by 2029

  3. Singapore Ministry of Finance, “Our assets and liabilities,” on the government’s no-net-debt position and assets in excess of liabilities

  4. IMF, “IMF Staff Concludes Visit to Senegal” (Nov. 2025), on the public-sector debt estimate near 132% of GDP

  5. Japan Ministry of Finance, “Breakdown by JGB and T-Bill Holders” (2025), on JGBs outstanding near ¥1,025.8 trillion and the domestic-heavy holder base

  6. Fitch Ratings, affirmation of Singapore at AAA with a stable outlook (April 2026).

Disclaimer: This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended as (and should not be considered to be) financial, investment or other advice on which reliance should be placed. No opinion given in the material constitutes a recommendation by EBC or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.